SEC T+2 Guide for Small Broker-Dealers: Key Points
The SEC's small entity compliance guide summarizes a change to the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions: from three business days after the trade date (T+3) to two business days after the trade date (T+2). The Commission amended Rule 15c6-1(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on March 22, 2017, and set September 5, 2017 as the compliance date by which industry participants should implement the transition.
The guide is prepared as a "small entity compliance guide" under Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It summarizes and explains rules the Commission adopted but is not a substitute for the rules themselves. Importantly for this site's readers, the guide deals only with traditional securities settlement; it does not address crypto or digital assets.
What the rule actually changes
Subject to the exceptions enumerated in the rule, the prohibition in paragraph (a) of Rule 15c6-1 applies to all securities. As of September 5, 2017, the standard settlement cycle for covered transactions became two business days following the date of the transaction, subject to the rule's exceptions.
The rule does not apply to several instrument types. Rule 15c6-1(a) does not apply to a contract for an exempted security, government security, municipal security, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, or commercial bills. The guide also references exceptions tied to firm commitment offerings registered under the Securities Act of 1933, though the exception details in the source are not fully reproduced here.
Who has to do work, and what kind
The guide notes that certain broker-dealers, including small entities, may need to make changes to their business operations and incur certain costs to operate in a T+2 environment. The described changes fall into a few categories:
- Business practices and systems: conversion may require changes to business practices and computer systems, and may include deploying new technology solutions.
- Testing: broker-dealers may need to test changes to systems, operations, policies, and procedures.
- Customer education: firms that serve retail customers may need to educate them about the shorter standard settlement cycle.
These are operational considerations the guide describes, not a projection of cost amounts. The guide does not quantify expected costs for small entities.
Knock-on effects on related deadlines
Shortening the standard settlement cycle could have an ancillary impact on how market participants, including small entities, comply with existing regulatory obligations related to the settlement cycle. The guide gives four concrete examples.
| Obligation | Before T+2 | Under T+2 |
|---|---|---|
| Rule 204 of Regulation SHO close-out, fails to deliver from short sales | T+4 | T+3 |
| Rule 204 close-out, fails to deliver from long sales or bona fide market making | T+6 | T+5 |
| Rule 10b-10 written confirmation timing | At or before completion | Effectively shorter timeframe |
| Rule 15c3-3(m) possession before close-out | 13 business days | 12 business days |
The Rule 204 close-out changes follow from the existing definition of settlement date in the rule. For Rule 10b-10, the shorter cycle effectively shortens the timeframe within which broker-dealers must give or send a written confirmation at or before completion of the transaction. For Rule 15c3-3(m), the amendment effectively reduces from 13 business days to 12 business days the time to obtain possession of customer securities before being required to close out a customer transaction.
Timeline
- March 22, 2017: the Commission amended Rule 15c6-1(a) to shorten the standard settlement cycle from T+3 to T+2.
- September 5, 2017: compliance date established by the Commission for implementing the transition; from this date the standard cycle is two business days following the transaction date, subject to exceptions.
These dates are past; the guide describes an adopted amendment and its implementation, not a proposal or a pending rulemaking.
A worked example (Hypothetical)
Assume a small broker-dealer executes a covered trade on a Monday. Under T+2, the standard settlement date would fall on Wednesday, two business days after the trade date. A short-sale fail to deliver from that trade would have a Rule 204 close-out deadline of T+3 relative to settlement, rather than T+4. Hypothetical: if the same firm also has a customer securities possession item under Rule 15c3-3(m), its window would be 12 business days after the relevant date instead of 13.
This example is illustrative only; actual dates depend on the specific rule definitions and the transaction's facts.
Checklist assembled from the guide's described considerations
The following is a synthesis of operational points the guide describes, not an SEC-provided checklist and not a compliance certification:
- Review whether your transactions are covered by Rule 15c6-1(a) or fall within an enumerated exception.
- Map system and process changes needed to operate on a T+2 cycle.
- Plan testing of systems, operations, policies, and procedures.
- Update customer communications if you serve retail customers.
- Recheck Rule 204, Rule 10b-10, and Rule 15c3-3(m) workflows against the shortened timeframes.
- Consult the rule text and professional advisers for obligations that apply to your firm.
What the source does not say
The guide does not mention crypto, digital assets, tokens, or blockchain-based settlement. It does not quantify costs for small entities, does not provide a compliance checklist, and does not state how any individual firm should implement the change. It does not describe a proposed rule or an approval timeline beyond the March 22, 2017 amendment and the September 5, 2017 compliance date. Claims about relevance to digital-asset market structure are not supported by this source.
0 comments
Be the first to share your thoughts on this post.